The Boldin Financial Planner Take control of your plans. Retire earlier, with more security and find financial confidence.
Get expert support Make sure your plan is set up correctly with a coach. Or, talk to a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER® from Boldin Advisors for even more guidance and support.
Resources Fuel your financial planning know-how
Blog Your guide to financial planning and retirement
April 4, 2026 • 19 minutes
If you’re thinking about how to retire at 62, you’ve probably done a lot of the math already. The harder part is knowing whether the whole picture holds together once you factor in a longer retirement, smaller Social Security checks, and a few years without Medicare. Retiring at 62 is possible. The key is planning, not guessing.
Three things make retiring at 62 different from retiring at 66 or 67: a coverage window before Medicare, a Social Security benefit that’s permanently smaller if you claim early, and a portfolio that has to carry more weight for longer. All three are solvable. Your plan just has to account for each one.
“You can retire at 62,” says Nancy Gates, Boldin’s lead educator and financial wellness coach. “The question usually isn’t whether you’ve saved enough, it’s whether you’ve planned enough. Knowing when to claim Social Security, building a healthcare bridge, stress-testing the whole picture before you commit. That’s the real work.”
We’ll cover each piece of that transition: the financial constraints, the planning windows, and how to think through whether 62 is the right year for you.
Retiring at 62 means three years without Medicare, a Social Security check that’s permanently smaller if you claim right away, and a portfolio that may need to last 30 years or more. None of these disqualify 62 as a target. Each has a planning solution, but you have to account for all three at once.
Most retirement planning tools and assumptions are calibrated for 65. Retire three years earlier and you’re working with a different set of constraints that change how your income, healthcare, and investments fit together.
Full retirement age (FRA) is 66 (for people born 1943–1954) or 67 (for people born in 1960 or later). Claim at 62 and your monthly benefit takes a permanent cut of up to 30% compared to what you’d receive at FRA. For retirees whose budget rests heavily on what Social Security alone provides, that’s a number worth understanding before you commit.
Medicare starts at 65 regardless of when you retire. Stop working at 62 and, unless you’re covered by a spouse or have retiree coverage, you’re responsible for three years of private insurance, typically through the ACA marketplace.
For a 62-year-old, full-price premiums and out-of-pocket costs can run $12,000 to $20,000 or more per year depending on income, location, and plan choice, which is why those costs need to be priced into your plan before you leave work.
A retirement starting at 62 could run 30 years or more. That shifts both how large your portfolio needs to be going in and how carefully you have to manage withdrawals compared with someone who waits until 65. The earlier you start, the more important it becomes to keep your initial withdrawal rate conservative, especially in the years before Social Security begins.
The earliest you can claim Social Security retirement benefits is 62. It’s also where the benefit cut is steepest, up to 30% below what you’d receive at full retirement age for someone with an FRA of 67. That reduction doesn’t go away. It’s locked in for the rest of your life.
The reduction is calculated based on how many months before your FRA you claim. For an FRA of 67, claiming at 62 means taking benefits 60 months early; for an FRA of 66, it’s 48 months early.
Delaying Social Security is an insurance decision. With each year you wait, you secure a higher floor of guaranteed, inflation-adjusted income for as long as you live, which matters most in your 80s and beyond, when your portfolio has had decades of market exposure and you may no longer be managing withdrawals with much precision.
Claiming at 62 can still make sense when health is poor, when no other income covers your expenses, or when the math works out better for your specific situation, such as when delaying would force unsustainably high portfolio withdrawals.
One important distinction: retiring at 62 and claiming Social Security at 62 are two separate choices. You can stop working now and hold off on claiming until 65, 66, or 67 if your portfolio or other income sources can cover the difference.
Retire now, delay the claim. This combo is common among people with enough savings to bridge the distance, and it’s something the Boldin Planner can map across different claiming scenarios.
Medicare eligibility doesn’t change when you retire. Medicare starts at 65 whether you stop working at 55, 62, or 70, which means a three-year coverage gap if you leave work at 62. For most people, that gap is filled by ACA marketplace insurance, COBRA for a limited period, or coverage through a spouse’s employer.
The full breakdown, including cost ranges by coverage type, how ACA subsidies work and where the income thresholds fall, and how to manage your income to keep premiums in check, is in Health Insurance at 62: How to Afford Coverage Before Medicare.
Get a realistic premium and out-of-pocket number into your plan before you finalize your income strategy for the first three years. This is one of the most common places where early retirees underestimate their costs.
A rough benchmark for retiring at 62 is to plan for 28 to 30 times your annual spending, especially if you want your money to last 30 years or more.
Someone spending $60,000 per year who expects $20,000 in annual Social Security benefits would need to cover $40,000 per year from their portfolio. At a 3.3% to 3.5% withdrawal rate, that works out to roughly $1.1 to $1.2 million in invested assets.
Most retirement planning models assume a 20 to 25-year horizon, but at 62, you’re planning for 30 years or more. That changes both how much you need going in and how carefully you have to draw it down, especially in the early years before Social Security starts.
You’ve probably heard of the 4% withdrawal rule. Under that rule, a $1 million portfolio would support about $40,000 a year in withdrawals. But more recent research suggests lower starting rates are prudent for early retirees or those concerned about poor early-retirement market returns.
A starting rate in the 3.3% to 3.5% range is worth considering if you’re leaving work at 62 and could be retired for three decades or longer.
How much you need to retire early comes down to what income you’ll have from day one and when the rest kicks in. Three questions anchor your readiness picture:
The Boldin Planner runs projections of income, spending, and account balances through the full transition into retirement, so you can answer these questions with your specific numbers.
The stretch from 62 to 65 packs in more consequential decisions than most of the retirement that follows. ACA income thresholds, Roth conversion brackets, and Social Security timing all interact in this window. Getting them wrong in year one can cost more than almost any single planning decision you make later.
ACA subsidies are based on your modified adjusted gross income, not your account balances, and are available only within certain income ranges. For a single filer in 2026, that’s roughly between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level, approximately $15,060 to $60,240. A dollar over that upper threshold can sharply reduce or eliminate subsidies entirely.
Managing which accounts you draw from, and how much taxable income you create, is worth modeling carefully.
By prioritizing withdrawals from cash savings, taxable brokerage accounts with built-in cost basis, or Roth accounts in some years, you may be able to keep ACA-relevant income low enough to qualify for premium tax credits, lowering your out-of-pocket health costs throughout the 62-to-65 window.
A Roth conversion moves money from a pre-tax account (a traditional IRA or 401(k)) into a Roth account. You pay ordinary income tax on the converted amount in the year of the conversion. In exchange, future withdrawals from the Roth are tax-free if the account has been open at least five years and you’re 59½ or older at the time of withdrawal.
If your taxable income drops when you retire at 62, the years between retirement and your first required minimum distributions (RMDs) can be an ideal time to convert at lower tax rates. Moving money out of tax-deferred accounts while you’re in a lower bracket means less of it gets hit at higher ordinary income rates when distributions are eventually forced. It also potentially reduces exposure to IRMAA surcharges on Medicare premiums in your 70s.
The longer the runway before RMDs, the more room you have to convert gradually instead of in large, bracket-busting chunks.
If your portfolio, a spouse’s income, or part-time work can cover your expenses, holding off on your Social Security claim until 65, 67, or even 70 boosts your monthly benefit, increases your lifetime inflation-adjusted income if you live a long life, and gives you more control over your taxable income in the meantime.
These variables, including ACA income thresholds, Roth conversion brackets, and Social Security timing, interact in ways that are hard to get right without modeling them together. The Boldin Planner shows how each decision plays out across the full timeline before you’ve locked anything in.
An extra year of work adds money to your portfolio, shortens the runway it needs to cover, gets you closer to Medicare and full Social Security retirement age, and keeps employer health coverage running. Those four effects compound, so a single year can move the retirement math more than most people expect when they see it modeled.
The difference between retiring at 62 and retiring at 63 or 64 is often larger than people assume: one more year of savings contributions, one fewer year of portfolio withdrawals, an extra year of growth on invested assets, and potentially a higher Social Security benefit if you’re still in your peak earning years.
The delay isn’t always worth it. If your health is declining, work has become unsustainable, or your plan already holds together at 62, staying longer just to squeeze more out of the numbers may cost more than it returns in stress, burnout, or lost healthy time.
“Your time, and what you do with it, is the asset no portfolio can replace,” says Nancy. “A year of freedom, of presence, of choosing how your days go. That has value too. It just doesn’t show up in a spreadsheet.”
Plenty of people run their numbers and find they’re a year or two short of where they’d like to be. That doesn’t mean retiring at 62 is off the table. It means you have a clearer picture of what an extra year or two of work can close.
The most common shortfalls are healthcare funding for the 62-to-65 window, a portfolio that’s slightly under target, and a Social Security plan that hasn’t fully accounted for delaying benefits. Pricing out ACA coverage and building those premiums and out-of-pocket costs into your budget shows whether healthcare is the limiting factor.
Running one to two more years of contributions into your projections reveals how much additional savings could raise your retirement income or lower your withdrawal rate. Modeling a later Social Security claim demonstrates how much more guaranteed income you’d have in your 70s and 80s.
When you can see on paper that one more year closes your healthcare shortfall, brings your portfolio from 24x spending to 27x, and lets you delay Social Security by a year or two, the decision gets concrete. You’re no longer wondering vaguely if you’re ready. You know where you stand and what each option buys you.
Getting the financial plan right is necessary. It’s not sufficient. Retirees who struggle at 62 aren’t usually the ones who ran out of money. They’re the ones who ran out of structure, purpose, and connection.
A growing body of research on the second half of life, including work highlighted by Arthur Brooks in From Strength to Strength and long-running studies of adult development, finds that people who thrive in later life tend to shift their focus from achievement and status toward relationships, service, and using their strengths in new ways. (Some of them might even come to regret not retiring earlier.)
In practice, that looks like building a life where your energy has somewhere meaningful to go: volunteering, creating, caregiving, or immersing yourself in communities that matter to you.
Retiring without a structure for your days is a real risk. Boredom, identity loss, and isolation show up faster than most people expect, and they hit hardest for people who built their sense of purpose around work. The people who navigate early retirement best usually have at least a loose plan for what will fill their days, who they’ll stay connected to, and where they’ll find a sense of usefulness and growth once the calendar isn’t dictated by a job.
Retiring at 62 means you may have 30 years of healthy time ahead. That’s a long stretch to fill, and a concrete plan for how to use it — what fills the days, who you’ll regularly see, what roles you want to play — is worth building before you hand in your notice.
Before you circle 62 on the calendar, it helps to be able to say yes to as many of these as possible.
If you can’t yet check all of these, that doesn’t mean you have to abandon 62 as a goal. It means you know exactly where to focus your planning over the next year or two.
Nothing in this article should be taken as specific financial, tax, or legal advice. For help applying these concepts, Boldin Advisors offers fee-only financial planning built around your Boldin plan.
Health and energy top the list of reasons for many people who retire at 62. The years right after 62 tend to be active ones. Waiting for a perfect number can cost you good years you won’t get back. Job burnout drives plenty of early exits too. A buyout or a shrinking job market can turn 62 from a nice idea into the practical choice. Family plays a role as well, whether that means more time with a spouse or stepping in to help with grandkids. People who land well at 62 tend to share one habit: they price out healthcare costs and Social Security tradeoffs before they give notice.
Retiring at 62 and collecting Social Security at 62 are two separate decisions. Age 62 is the earliest you can claim benefits, but if you do, your monthly check is permanently reduced by up to 30% compared to what you’d receive at full retirement age, which is 66 or 67 for most people today. You can also retire at 62 and delay your claim to 65, 66, 67, or even 70 if other income sources can cover your expenses, which raises your monthly benefit for life.
The most underestimated risk of retiring at 62 is healthcare costs in the three years before Medicare eligibility at 65. Without employer coverage, most 62-year-olds rely on ACA marketplace insurance, and premiums plus out-of-pocket costs can easily exceed $15,000 per year depending on income, location, and plan choice. Building those costs into your retirement budget and understanding how ACA subsidies work is essential before you leave work.
The amount you need to retire at 62 depends on your annual spending, expected Social Security benefit, and other income sources, but a useful benchmark is roughly 28 to 30 times your annual spending needs from your portfolio. If you expect to spend $60,000 per year and Social Security covers $20,000 of that, your portfolio needs to support $40,000 per year in withdrawals, which at a 3.3% to 3.5% starting withdrawal rate means roughly $1.1 to $1.2 million in invested assets. More detailed planning can refine those numbers based on your risk tolerance, health, and goals.
Retiring at 62 does not make you eligible for Medicare. Medicare eligibility generally starts at 65 regardless of when you stop working, which means someone who retires at 62 needs to arrange their own health coverage for that three-year period. ACA marketplace plans, a spouse’s employer plan, retiree health benefits, or COBRA are the most common options to bridge the distance until Medicare begins.
If you retire at 62, you can access your 401(k) and traditional IRA funds without the 10% early withdrawal penalty, which applies only before age 59½ in most cases. Withdrawals from traditional accounts are taxed as ordinary income in the year you take them, which is why planning the size and timing of those withdrawals matters for both taxes and ACA subsidies in the 62-to-65 window. If you separated from your employer at 55 or later, the Rule of 55 may allow penalty-free withdrawals from that employer’s plan even before 59½.
Retiring at 62 works well for people with a portfolio large enough to support a longer retirement, a clear plan for health coverage before Medicare, and a concrete sense of what they’re retiring toward. For those who are close but not quite financially ready, one or two additional years of work can move the needle on all three at once: more savings, a shorter runway to cover, and another year closer to Medicare and a higher Social Security benefit.
In your first year of retirement at 62, your tax picture typically includes three main components: any wages earned before retiring, withdrawals from traditional retirement accounts taxed as ordinary income, and investment income such as dividends, interest, or capital gains. If you do Roth conversions, the converted amount is also taxed as ordinary income in the year of conversion, even though future qualified withdrawals from the Roth will be tax-free.
If you want to retire at 62 but find you’re a bit short, the most useful step is to identify exactly what you’re short on: healthcare funding before Medicare, portfolio size, or a Social Security plan that doesn’t yet account for delaying benefits. For healthcare, pricing out ACA coverage shows whether that line item is the limiting factor. For your portfolio, projecting one to two more years of savings reveals how much extra cushion that creates. Modeling different Social Security claiming ages shows how much waiting would raise your monthly benefit and reduce the strain on your investments, so you can decide whether an extra year or two of work is worth it.
Take financial wellness into your own hands and do it yourself retirement planning: easy, comprehensive, reliable.
Average health insurance cost from 62 to 65 often tops $1,000 a month without a subsidy. See real cost ranges and how to plan for it.
Layoffs, health problems, and caregiving push most retirements earlier than planned. See average retirement age by state and data source.
Median retirement savings are $185,000 for ages 55 to 64, dropping to $130,000 at 75+. See 401(k) & IRA balances broken down by age group.
